The scientificalization, systematization and standardization of teachers' evaluation system have significant educational value in improving teachers' teaching efficiency, promoting teachers' professional development, and ensuring the quality of education and teaching and promoting the rapid progress of education in our country. On the basis of analyzing a series of problems such as the single evaluation index system, the seriousness of quantification tendency, the lack of evaluation subject status, the evaluation orientation deviation, the lack of feedback mechanism and the lack of objectivity in the evaluation process, this paper puts forward the solutions from the aspects of evaluation purpose, evaluation content, evaluation method, evaluation subject and evaluation feedback.
| Published in | Science Journal of Education (Volume 5, Issue 5) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.sjedu.20170505.12 |
| Page(s) | 196-199 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
College Teacher, Evaluation System, Education Quality, Personnel Training
| [1] | Liu Z, Wang H, Zhang H. Construction of an evaluation system for promoting the development of teachers [J]. Tsinghua University Education Research, 2015, 36 (6): 81-85. |
| [2] | Li L, Zhang M. The development of university teachers' performance evaluation process [J]. Economic Research Guide, 2016, 3 (29): 58-59. |
| [3] | Cao R. Teachers' evaluation system problems and improvement [J]. Journal Of National Academy Of Education Administration, 2012, 18 (3): 73. |
| [4] | Xu S. Influence factors and construction principles of university teacher evaluation system [J]. Faculty Research of Chinese Universities and Colleges, 2008, 16 (4): 17-20. |
| [5] | Wang K. Performance evaluation system of american college teachers and its enlightenment to china [J]. Journal of Northeastern University, 2013, 15 (6): 642-646. |
| [6] | Li C. Problems and countermeasures in academic evaluation of college teachers [J]. Modern Educational Science, 2006, 17 (11): 81-84. |
| [7] | Xu C, Jiang Z, Zhou J. Problems And Improvement Strategies of Performance Evaluation of University Teachers [J]. Journal of Heilongjiang Institute of Education, 2017, 36 (1): 20-22. |
| [8] | Wang K, Ho J. Strategic orientation from the perspective of performance evaluation of university teachers innovative research [J]. Journal of Liaoning University: Philosophy And Social Science Edition, 2012, 40 (6): 99-103. |
| [9] | Yin M. Reflections on the feedback of teaching effectiveness evaluation of university teachers [J]. Journal of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, 2010, 23 (4): 141-144. |
| [10] | Zhu S. On university teachers' performance evaluation implementation suggestion [J]. Modern Economic Information, 2016, 26 (13): 77. |
| [11] | Wang S. Review of research and practice on teaching evaluation of university teachers in china in recent ten years [J]. Jiangsu Higher Education, 2008, 18 (3): 70-73. |
| [12] | Chen Z. Analysis of some changes in teacher evaluation [J]. Teacher Education Research, 2012, 24 (5): 62-66. |
APA Style
Qi Yue, Yanyan Cao. (2017). Research on the Evaluation System of Teachers in Universities: Perspectives from China. Science Journal of Education, 5(5), 196-199. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20170505.12
ACS Style
Qi Yue; Yanyan Cao. Research on the Evaluation System of Teachers in Universities: Perspectives from China. Sci. J. Educ. 2017, 5(5), 196-199. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20170505.12
AMA Style
Qi Yue, Yanyan Cao. Research on the Evaluation System of Teachers in Universities: Perspectives from China. Sci J Educ. 2017;5(5):196-199. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20170505.12
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.sjedu.20170505.12,
author = {Qi Yue and Yanyan Cao},
title = {Research on the Evaluation System of Teachers in Universities: Perspectives from China},
journal = {Science Journal of Education},
volume = {5},
number = {5},
pages = {196-199},
doi = {10.11648/j.sjedu.20170505.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20170505.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjedu.20170505.12},
abstract = {The scientificalization, systematization and standardization of teachers' evaluation system have significant educational value in improving teachers' teaching efficiency, promoting teachers' professional development, and ensuring the quality of education and teaching and promoting the rapid progress of education in our country. On the basis of analyzing a series of problems such as the single evaluation index system, the seriousness of quantification tendency, the lack of evaluation subject status, the evaluation orientation deviation, the lack of feedback mechanism and the lack of objectivity in the evaluation process, this paper puts forward the solutions from the aspects of evaluation purpose, evaluation content, evaluation method, evaluation subject and evaluation feedback.},
year = {2017}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Research on the Evaluation System of Teachers in Universities: Perspectives from China AU - Qi Yue AU - Yanyan Cao Y1 - 2017/08/01 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20170505.12 DO - 10.11648/j.sjedu.20170505.12 T2 - Science Journal of Education JF - Science Journal of Education JO - Science Journal of Education SP - 196 EP - 199 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2329-0897 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20170505.12 AB - The scientificalization, systematization and standardization of teachers' evaluation system have significant educational value in improving teachers' teaching efficiency, promoting teachers' professional development, and ensuring the quality of education and teaching and promoting the rapid progress of education in our country. On the basis of analyzing a series of problems such as the single evaluation index system, the seriousness of quantification tendency, the lack of evaluation subject status, the evaluation orientation deviation, the lack of feedback mechanism and the lack of objectivity in the evaluation process, this paper puts forward the solutions from the aspects of evaluation purpose, evaluation content, evaluation method, evaluation subject and evaluation feedback. VL - 5 IS - 5 ER -
Email: