Bullying has been considered a problem that has come to stay among students especially at secondary school level, and when the word bullying is mentioned, what comes to mind is physical aggression among boys. The study has been able to assess bullying from different dimensions by employing Multi-dimensional Peer-victimization scale (MPVS). 561 secondary school students drawn from three schools comprising of one boys only, one girls only and one mixed school consisting of boys and girls, making a total of 300 boys and 261 girls, all in Ekiti State, Nigeria were involved. The result of the study reveals that female students (Mean = 15.01) score significantly higher in bullying than male students (Mean = 12.21); in verbal victimization (mean Female = 4.32, Male = 3.64), attack on property (mean Female = 4.42, Male = 3.52), and social manipulation (mean Female = 4.01, Male = 2.61). There is no significant difference between male and female students in physical victimization.
Published in | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences (Volume 4, Issue 5) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.pbs.20150405.13 |
Page(s) | 190-193 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Bullying, Peer Victimization, Social Manipulation, Attack on Properties, Verbal Victimization
[1] | Bandura A. & Walters, R. (1963). Social learning and personality development. New York: Holt. Rinehart & Winston. |
[2] | Berthold, K. A. & Hoover, J. H. (2000). Correlates of bullying and victimization among intermediate students in Midwestern USA. Journal of School Psychology International, 21(1), 65-78. |
[3] | Carney, A. G. & Merrell, K. W. (2001). Bullying in schools: perspectives on understanding and preventing an international problem. Journal of School Psychology International, 22(3), 364-382. |
[4] | Crick N. R. & Rose A. J. (2000). Towards a gender-balanced approach to the study of social-emotional development: A look at relational aggression. In R. G. Geen & E. Donnerstein (Eds), Human aggression: Theories, research, and implication for social policy (pp. 153-168). San Diego Academic Press. |
[5] | Egan, S. K. & Perry, D. G. (1998). Does low self-regard invite victimization? Journal of Developmental Psychology, 34, 299-309. |
[6] | Federal Ministry of Education (2007). The national strategic framework for violence free basic education in Nigeria. Abuja: Federal Ministry of Education. |
[7] | Galen B. R. & Underwood M. K. (1997). Developmental psychology.33, 589-600. |
[8] | Mynard, H. and Joseph, S. (2000). Development of multidimensional peer-victimization scale. Aggressive Behaviour 26, 169-178. |
[9] | Nansel, T. R., Overpeck, M., Pilla, R. S., Ruan, W. J., Simons-Morton, B., & Scheidt, P. (2001). Bullying Behaviors among U. S. Youth: Prevalence and Association with Psychosocial Adjustment. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285 (16) 2094-2100. |
[10] | Olweus, D. (1993). Victimization by peers: antecedents and long term outcomes. In K. H. Rubin & J. B Asenddorf (Eds.), Social Withdrawal, Inhibition, and Shyness in childhood. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. |
[11] | Olweus, D. (2003). Bullying at school, what we know and what we can do. Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell London. 145-149. |
[12] | Owoyemi O. & Oyelere, M. (2010). Workplace bullying: an undiagnosed social school students in Nigeria. International Education Journal, 2005, 6(5), 598-606. |
[13] | Pelegrini, A. D. (1998). Bullies and victims in school: A review and call for research. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 19, 15-176. |
[14] | Rigby k. (1996). Bullying in school and what to do about it. Melbourne: The Australian Council for Educational Research |
[15] | Ross D. (2002). Bullying. In J Sandoval (Ed.), Handbook of crisis counseling, intervention, and prevention in the schools (electronic version) 2nd ed., 105-135: Mahwah, NJ: I, Erlbaum Associates. |
[16] | Schafer, M., Werner, N. E., & Crick, N. R. (2002). A comparison of two approaches to the study of negative peer treatment: General victimization and bully/victim problems among German school children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 20, 281-306. |
[17] | Whitney I. & Smith P. K., (1993). A survey of the nature and extent of bullying in junior/ middle and secondary schools. Journal on Educational Research 35, 3 - 25. |
APA Style
Mokuolu Bolade Olubunmi. (2015). Dimensions of Bullying Among Secondary School Students in Ekiti State, Nigeria. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 4(5), 190-193. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20150405.13
ACS Style
Mokuolu Bolade Olubunmi. Dimensions of Bullying Among Secondary School Students in Ekiti State, Nigeria. Psychol. Behav. Sci. 2015, 4(5), 190-193. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20150405.13
AMA Style
Mokuolu Bolade Olubunmi. Dimensions of Bullying Among Secondary School Students in Ekiti State, Nigeria. Psychol Behav Sci. 2015;4(5):190-193. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20150405.13
@article{10.11648/j.pbs.20150405.13, author = {Mokuolu Bolade Olubunmi}, title = {Dimensions of Bullying Among Secondary School Students in Ekiti State, Nigeria}, journal = {Psychology and Behavioral Sciences}, volume = {4}, number = {5}, pages = {190-193}, doi = {10.11648/j.pbs.20150405.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20150405.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.pbs.20150405.13}, abstract = {Bullying has been considered a problem that has come to stay among students especially at secondary school level, and when the word bullying is mentioned, what comes to mind is physical aggression among boys. The study has been able to assess bullying from different dimensions by employing Multi-dimensional Peer-victimization scale (MPVS). 561 secondary school students drawn from three schools comprising of one boys only, one girls only and one mixed school consisting of boys and girls, making a total of 300 boys and 261 girls, all in Ekiti State, Nigeria were involved. The result of the study reveals that female students (Mean = 15.01) score significantly higher in bullying than male students (Mean = 12.21); in verbal victimization (mean Female = 4.32, Male = 3.64), attack on property (mean Female = 4.42, Male = 3.52), and social manipulation (mean Female = 4.01, Male = 2.61). There is no significant difference between male and female students in physical victimization.}, year = {2015} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Dimensions of Bullying Among Secondary School Students in Ekiti State, Nigeria AU - Mokuolu Bolade Olubunmi Y1 - 2015/10/13 PY - 2015 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20150405.13 DO - 10.11648/j.pbs.20150405.13 T2 - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences JF - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences JO - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences SP - 190 EP - 193 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-7845 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20150405.13 AB - Bullying has been considered a problem that has come to stay among students especially at secondary school level, and when the word bullying is mentioned, what comes to mind is physical aggression among boys. The study has been able to assess bullying from different dimensions by employing Multi-dimensional Peer-victimization scale (MPVS). 561 secondary school students drawn from three schools comprising of one boys only, one girls only and one mixed school consisting of boys and girls, making a total of 300 boys and 261 girls, all in Ekiti State, Nigeria were involved. The result of the study reveals that female students (Mean = 15.01) score significantly higher in bullying than male students (Mean = 12.21); in verbal victimization (mean Female = 4.32, Male = 3.64), attack on property (mean Female = 4.42, Male = 3.52), and social manipulation (mean Female = 4.01, Male = 2.61). There is no significant difference between male and female students in physical victimization. VL - 4 IS - 5 ER -