| Peer-Reviewed

Adaptability and Stability of Soybean Cultivars Under Different Times of Sowing in Southern Brazil

Received: 7 March 2016     Accepted: 13 March 2016     Published: 29 March 2016
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

There is a large number of soybean cultivars recommended to the many regions that soybean is cultivated and, even though these cultivars hold a high potential yield, the environmental variation can alter the expected yield due to the genetic x environment interaction. So, the aim of this study was to evaluate the adaptability and stability of ten soybean cultivars in five environments, sowed in different times, in Palotina-PR. The randomized block design was used with three repetitions. The study was conducted in the 2013/14 and 2014/15 harvests. The Eberhart & Russel (1966) and MHPRVG (Resende 2004) methods were used to evaluate the yield adaptability and stability. Based on the results of either methods, the cultivars TMG 7060 RR, TMG 7062 IPRO and NA 5909 RG showed wide adaptability and high stability to this cultivation area.

Published in Journal of Plant Sciences (Volume 4, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.jps.20160402.11
Page(s) 17-22
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2016. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Genotype x Environment Interaction, Glycine max L., Yield

References
[1] ALLARD, R. W. (1961). Relationship between genetic diversity and consistency of performance in different environments. Crop Science, 1: 127-133.
[2] BORÉM, A.; MIRANDA, G. V. Plant Breeding. 4. ed. Viçosa: UFV, 2005. 525 p.
[3] CAVALCANTE, A. K., HAMAWAKI, O. T., HAMAWAKI, R. L., SOUSA, L. B., NOGUEIRA, A. P. O., & HAMAWAKI, C. D. L. Adaptabilidade e estabilidade fenotipica de genótipos de soja em porto alegre do norte, mt = Fentopic adaptability and stability in soybean genotypes in Porto Alegre do Norte, state of Mato Grosso. Bioscience Journal, 30(4). 2014.
[4] CHAVES, L. J. Interação de genótipos com ambientes. Interaction of genotypes with environments. In: NASS, L.L.; VALOIS, A.C. C.; MELO, I.S.; VALADARES-INGLIS, M.C. (ed.) Recursos genéticos e melhoramento de plantas. Rondonópolis: Fundação MT, 1183p. 2001.
[5] CRUZ, C. D. et al. Modelos biométricos aplicados ao melhoramento genético. Biometric models applied to plant breeding. 4. ed. Viçosa: UFV, 2006. 390 p.
[6] CULTIVARWEB. Gerenciamento de Informação. Registro Nacional de Cultivares – RNC. Information managment. National Cultivars Record. Disponível em: http://extranet.agricultura.gov.br/php/snpc/cultivarweb/cultivares_registradas.php. Acesso em: 01/04/2015.
[7] EBERHART, S. A.; RUSSELL, W. A. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Science, Madison, v.6, n.1, p. 36-40, 1966.
[8] EMBRAPA. Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos. Brazilian system of soil classification. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro, 240p. 2006.
[9] EMBRAPA. Tecnologias de produção de soja: região central do Brasil: 2012 e 2013. Soybean production Technologies: Brazilian’s Central Region: 2012 and 2013. Londrina: Embrapa Soja; Embrapa Cerrados; Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste, 2011. 261p. (Sistemas de Produção, 15).
[10] FARIAS, J. R. B.; NEPOMUCENO, A. L.; NEUMAIER, N. Ecofisiologia da soja. Soybean ecophysiology. Circular Técnica 48. Londrina, PR, Setembro, 2007.
[11] FEHR, W. R. et al. Stage of development description for soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merrill. Crop Science, Madison, v.11, n.6, p.929-931, 1971.
[12] FERREIRA, D. F. Sisvar: a computer statistical analysis system. Ciência e Agrotecnologia (UFLA), Lavras, v. 35, n.6, p. 1039-1042, 2011.
[13] FINLAY, K. W.; WILKINSON, G. N. The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, Collingwood, v.14, n.5, p.742-754, 1963.
[14] GONÇALVES, E. C. P.; DI MAURO, A. O.; CARGNELUTTI FILHO, A.. Adaptabilidade e estabilidade de genótipos de soja conduzidos em duas épocas de semeadura, na região de Jaboticabal – SP. Adaptability and stability of soybean genotypes conducted in two sowing dates, in the region of Jaboticabal – SP. Científica, Jaboticabal, v.35, n.1, p. 61-70, 2007.
[15] PELUZIO, J. M. Interação cultivar x ambiente e correlações fenotípicas, genotípicas e ambientais entre cultivares de soja no Estado do Tocantins. Cultivar x environment interaction and phenotypic, genotypic and environmental interactions among soybean cultivars in Tocatins State. 86 f. Tese (Doutorado em Genética e Melhoramento de Plantas) - Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa. 1996.
[16] PELÚZIO, J. M.; FIDELIS, R. R.; GIONGO, P.; Da SILVA, J. C.; CAPPELLARI, D.; BARROS, H. B. Adaptabilidade e estabilidade de cultivares de soja em quatro épocas de semeadura no sul do Estado do Tocantins. Adaptability and stability of soybean cultivars in four sowing dates in Southern Tocatins State. Revista Ceres, v. 55, n. 1, p. 034, 2008.
[17] PRADO, E. E.; HIROMOTO, D. E.; GODINHO, V. de P. C.; UTUMI, M. M.; RAMALHO, A. R. Adaptabilidade e estabilidade de cultivares de soja em cinco épocas de plantio no cerrado de Rondônia. Adaptability and stability of soybean cultivars in five sowing dates in Rondonia’s Cerrado. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, v. 36, n. 4, p. 625-635, 2001.
[18] RAIZER, A. J.; VENCOVSKY, R. Estabilidade fenotípica de novas variedades de cana-de-açúcar para o estado de São Paulo. Phenotypic stability of new sugar-cane cultivars recommended to São Paulo State. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, v. 34, n. 12, p. 2241-2246, 1999.
[19] RESENDE, M. D. V. Métodos estatísticos ótimos na análise de experimentos de campo. Colombo. Great statistical methods to analyze field experiments. Embrapa Florestas. 65p. (Documentos, 100). 2004.
[20] ROCHA, M. M. Seleção de linhagens experimentais de soja para adaptabilidade e estabilidade fenotípica. Selection of experimental soybean lines for phenotypic adaptability and stability. Piracicaba, 165f. Tese (Doutorado em Genética e Melhoramento de Plantas) Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz", Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, 2002.
[21] ROSADO, A. M.; ROSADO, T. B.; ALVES, A. A.; LAVIOLA, B. G.; BHERING, L. L. Seleção simultânea de clones de eucalipto de acordo com produtividade, estabilidade e adaptabilidade. Eucalyptus clones simultaneous selection according to yield, stability and adaptability. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, v. 47, n. 7, p. 966-973, 2012.
[22] TEIXEIRA JÚNIOR, T., PELUZIO, J. M., DE MELO, A. V., ARCHANGELO, E. R., & AFFERRI, F. S. Correlation among adaptability and stability methodologies for soybean genotypes in regions of degraded areas. Revista Agro@ mbiente On-line, 9(1), 35-41. 2015.
[23] TEODORO, P. E., BARROSO, L. M. A., NASCIMENTO, M., TORRES, F. E., SAGRILO, E., SANTOS, A. D., & RIBEIRO, L. P. Artificial neural networks to identify semi-prostrate cowpea genotypes with high phenotypic adaptability and stability. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 50(11), 1054-1060. 2015.
[24] UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE LAVRAS. Estabilidade (software): versão 3.0. Lavras: Ufla-DEX, 2000.
[25] VERNETTI, F. de J.; GASTAL, M. F. da C.; ZONTA, E. P. Estabilidade fenotípica de cultivares de soja no sudeste do Rio Grande do Sul. Phenotypic stability of soybean cultivars in Southeastern Rio Grande do Sul State. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, V. 25, n.11, p. 1593-1602, nov. 1990.
[26] ZENI-NETO, H.; OLIVEIRA, R.A. de; DAROS, E.; BESPALHOK FILHO, J. C.; ZAMBON, J. L. C.; IDO, O. T.; WEBER, H. Seleção para produtividade, estabilidade e adaptabilidade de clones de cana-de-açúcar em três ambientes no Estado do Paraná via modelos mistos. Selection to yield, stability and adaptability of sugar-cane clones in three environments in Parana State through mixed models. Scientia Agraria, Curitiba, v.9, p.425-430, 2008.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Augusto Tessele, Robson Fernando Missio, Juliano Boroluzzi Lorenzetti, Jean Carlos Bortoloto Trentini, Ruan Carlos Navarro Furtado, et al. (2016). Adaptability and Stability of Soybean Cultivars Under Different Times of Sowing in Southern Brazil. Journal of Plant Sciences, 4(2), 17-22. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20160402.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Augusto Tessele; Robson Fernando Missio; Juliano Boroluzzi Lorenzetti; Jean Carlos Bortoloto Trentini; Ruan Carlos Navarro Furtado, et al. Adaptability and Stability of Soybean Cultivars Under Different Times of Sowing in Southern Brazil. J. Plant Sci. 2016, 4(2), 17-22. doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20160402.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Augusto Tessele, Robson Fernando Missio, Juliano Boroluzzi Lorenzetti, Jean Carlos Bortoloto Trentini, Ruan Carlos Navarro Furtado, et al. Adaptability and Stability of Soybean Cultivars Under Different Times of Sowing in Southern Brazil. J Plant Sci. 2016;4(2):17-22. doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20160402.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.jps.20160402.11,
      author = {Augusto Tessele and Robson Fernando Missio and Juliano Boroluzzi Lorenzetti and Jean Carlos Bortoloto Trentini and Ruan Carlos Navarro Furtado and Giovane Moreno},
      title = {Adaptability and Stability of Soybean Cultivars Under Different Times of Sowing in Southern Brazil},
      journal = {Journal of Plant Sciences},
      volume = {4},
      number = {2},
      pages = {17-22},
      doi = {10.11648/j.jps.20160402.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20160402.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jps.20160402.11},
      abstract = {There is a large number of soybean cultivars recommended to the many regions that soybean is cultivated and, even though these cultivars hold a high potential yield, the environmental variation can alter the expected yield due to the genetic x environment interaction. So, the aim of this study was to evaluate the adaptability and stability of ten soybean cultivars in five environments, sowed in different times, in Palotina-PR. The randomized block design was used with three repetitions. The study was conducted in the 2013/14 and 2014/15 harvests. The Eberhart & Russel (1966) and MHPRVG (Resende 2004) methods were used to evaluate the yield adaptability and stability. Based on the results of either methods, the cultivars TMG 7060 RR, TMG 7062 IPRO and NA 5909 RG showed wide adaptability and high stability to this cultivation area.},
     year = {2016}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Adaptability and Stability of Soybean Cultivars Under Different Times of Sowing in Southern Brazil
    AU  - Augusto Tessele
    AU  - Robson Fernando Missio
    AU  - Juliano Boroluzzi Lorenzetti
    AU  - Jean Carlos Bortoloto Trentini
    AU  - Ruan Carlos Navarro Furtado
    AU  - Giovane Moreno
    Y1  - 2016/03/29
    PY  - 2016
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20160402.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.jps.20160402.11
    T2  - Journal of Plant Sciences
    JF  - Journal of Plant Sciences
    JO  - Journal of Plant Sciences
    SP  - 17
    EP  - 22
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2331-0731
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20160402.11
    AB  - There is a large number of soybean cultivars recommended to the many regions that soybean is cultivated and, even though these cultivars hold a high potential yield, the environmental variation can alter the expected yield due to the genetic x environment interaction. So, the aim of this study was to evaluate the adaptability and stability of ten soybean cultivars in five environments, sowed in different times, in Palotina-PR. The randomized block design was used with three repetitions. The study was conducted in the 2013/14 and 2014/15 harvests. The Eberhart & Russel (1966) and MHPRVG (Resende 2004) methods were used to evaluate the yield adaptability and stability. Based on the results of either methods, the cultivars TMG 7060 RR, TMG 7062 IPRO and NA 5909 RG showed wide adaptability and high stability to this cultivation area.
    VL  - 4
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Departament of Plant Science, Federal University of Vi?osa, Vi?osa, Brazil

  • Department of Agronomy, Federal University of Paraná, Palotina, Brazil

  • Department of Agronomy, Federal University of Paraná, Palotina, Brazil

  • Department of Agronomy, Federal University of Paraná, Palotina, Brazil

  • Department of Phytopathology, College of Agriculture Luiz de Queiroz (Esalq-USP), Piracibaca, Brazil

  • Department of Agronomy, Federal University of Paraná, Palotina, Brazil

  • Sections